Thinking about the railcar
Insights — without a vendor catalogue
We rewrote what the field already knows: you need an end-to-end solution in the railcar, a camera alone is not enough, and privacy starts with data that never leaves to the cloud. That is also the approach deployed worldwide, at different security levels.
Not just a camera. A sensor — and an end-to-end solution in the railcar.
A camera on its own records. What it lacks is an end-to-end path: a sensor layer and analysis on the railcar, without sending the footage to the cloud.
An end-to-end solution in the railcar, not a rack in the cloud
Tight space in the railcar is not an excuse to push analysis to the cloud. An end-to-end solution on the railcar does the work — in motion, and at different security levels worldwide.
Railcar, end-to-end solution, control room: three languages for one event
What happens in the aisle is not what the sensor sees, and not what the desk reads. Analytics should translate — not add another screen, and not a cloud.
Information security in the railcar: what we measure, and what never leaves to the cloud
A count is not an identity. A local record is not an upload to a vendor. Video stays with the operator — because that is both the law and the trust.
Heat map, transport standard, and the algorithm that stays in the railcar
Occupancy without identity, gear that meets the standard, and an algorithm that runs in the analysis unit. Plus many other scenarios the system can still take.